I'm glad she left.
She has a disorder. She doesn't respond well to being told what to do. I mean, nobody loves that. But she really, really, mental-shutdown-freak-out can't stand it...
Look, I get it – she lost her family, home, way of life, all that at a young age. And growing up aboard an orbital station – ours was pretty much a glorified refugee filled orphanage – sucks pretty hard.
But we all went through the same shit. We all orbited a crummy moon colony... followed the same rules, had the same amount of shit in our lives.
But Alice? She acted like the world was out to get her. She acted like every rule enforced was a personal affront or some shit.
I think she got off on it.
Other people certainly did. We got older, and people started seeing her hissy fits as some sort of rebellious statement. People started taking their cue from her and getting pissed off at whatever she was currently aimed at.
Like the curfew riots. Every damn time – christ. Ok, so the station would have these crime waves. Gangs and shit would get out of hand, or the admins would have some sort of tip off that some crime was about to go down. So the security admins would impose these curfews on us. They were temporary, and not that big a pain in the ass. But every time – and I mean every fucking time – Alice would make the biggest fucking deal out of it. She'd refuse to leave the public areas, and it would be this big showdown. And every time it got worse because people started joining her; and dragging one girl to her bunk is easy, but facing off against a group of pissed off thugs is a lot harder.
I mean, just stay in your bunk room! The curfews only lasted a day or so, and maybe if she had let the security admins do their jobs, they could solve the reason for the curfew in the first place!
Honestly, half the shit she had issues with were rules in place for her own damn good. Curfews. Positive language guidelines. Anti-lewdness regulations. Mental health checkups.
It's no wonder she barely had any friends. A few people might have thought she was cool or brave for “standing up to the man!” and a few probably just wanted to fuck her. But mainly I think she just annoyed everyone. And it's no secret that we and our get-along-and-live-in-a-functional-society attitude annoyed her. So everyone was happy when she left in that old cargo ship.
It's better for everyone. I hope she never comes back.
Mkay, so i'm posting this as a temporary filler page today. I'm pretty much booked solid without time to draw for the next two weeks, hah. So i'm going to try to get a new page up, but if not ya gotta wait till next week.
Anyways, in the mean time, enjoy another angst ridden, rebellious Alice story with picture!
Hope you enjoy! Thanks for checkin' in ^_^
And remember ~
PATREON and all that junk :D
Is this the point where you tell Trump voters not to read you anymore?
"Resist" and "resistance" have been used by many, MANY causes, some good, some bad, usually some of both. There's no reason to let the words be ruined by the current... uh... situation, however one feels about it.
Agreed. Let's please leave real world politics out of our escapism.
While I certainly wouldn't tell anyone not to read, i'm also not shy or obtuse about my political views, and the comic inevitably leans to match my outlook.
Straight up : I don't support Donald Trump.
Jay is obviously all about "Doing the morally right thing, even if it means accepting risks." which is pretty much the opposite of Trump's plan for the Mexico wall, Refugee shut downs, etc (which are, for better or worse, all pretty much "There is too much of a risk to help others")
Alice is pretty much the antithesis to "Make America Great Again" as in, her whole existence is centered around a philosophy of there being no objective "Great" and, *MOST* importantly, certainly she would never strive for a "great" that an authority figure decided upon.
So yeah, I won't pretend politics and opinions don't/won't seep into my work - and apologies if anyone doesn't like it, or doesn't agree.
In truth, a lot of the philosophical thoughts I tread on tend to be more "What IS the right thing to do?" instead of "THIS IS THE BEST THING."
Ie. do heavy handed methods have a place, do the ends justify the means, should the greater good count more than the individual, etc.
So I dunno. Take it for what it is ;)
But I certainly wouldn't tell anyone not to read it - and if anyone has another opinion, feel free to pipe up.
And that's my 2 cents on that ;)
"Jay is obviously all about "Doing the morally right thing, even if it means accepting risks." which is pretty much the opposite of Trump's plan for the Mexico wall, Refugee shut downs, etc (which are, for better or worse, all pretty much "There is too much of a risk to help others")"
So, you're saying every other country in the world is morally wrong for their stance on their own borders? Because every other country in the world that has the means to control their border does so. Including Mexico, actually (see how THEY treat "undocumented migrants" and how they handle their southern border...).
And you're saying international law on borders is also morally wrong?
Do you have locks on your door? Do you keep people out of your house who want to come into it without your permission? That is morally equivalent to border control - the people that own it and pay for it have the moral and ethical authority to control who comes in.
Understand that I don't "support" Donald Trump, either, but some of his official policy positions (as much as he has them) are pretty good (and some are terrible), and the border issue, in particular, is probably the single biggest "winning" issue he had. It's a winning issue with almost every demographic group in the US, on BOTH sides of the aisle, and he had it almost entirely to himself.
First up - you make very good points, and they're very well presented.
I don't disagree with the abstract concept of border control - but I do disagree with Trump's plan and methods.
Practically, I see the wall as a costly, symbolic effort that won't actually address the problem he claims exists.
The vast majority of "illegal" immigrants are simply people who overstay visas. The few who sneak across the land border of the US can be divided further into two groups : criminals, and people who, for their own reasons, are desperately seeking some sort of refuge or help.
So for billions upon billions of dollars, you're stopping a very small amount of criminals, and hampering an equal number of people who do need help. Not a win in my books.
Combine this with other initiatives like the increase in ICE raids and deportations, and you have a situation that I feel hurts innocent people at a rate that far outweighs the good you're doing.
Keep in mind a large amount of so-called "illigals" have also been living peacefully in America for a decade, with a family, working a steady job, etc.
Trump's initiatives are a broad stroke in an area that requires finesse. He's black and white in an area that, like it or not, requires the grey areas that have tentatively come to be (that is, it's ok to turn a blind eye to those families, or grant amnesty, etc, even if this allows a small amount of criminals to come into the country)
But it's a matter of opinion if the small amount of crime, or non-tax paying freeloaders is worth it. There's certainly no definitive answer, or objective truth.
I argue we can find ways to fight the bad without crippling the good - and that's Jay's stance as well.
"Never compromise, even in the face of Armageddon!"
But I know that's not an opinion everyone shares - which is why, even in the comic, there's plenty of people who view Jay, maybe rightfully so, as in the wrong for what he's done, and how he does things.
So that's what I meant, haha. Hopefully it kind of makes sense. The whole point of Jay, and Yesterdaybound, is a debate about what is right and wrong. What we should be doing, and how we should do it, etc etc etc.
Thanks actually reading and thinking about what I wrote - that's rare, these days, and I can often come off as caustic, so I'm glad you could get past that.
I had a big reply, touching lots of topics, but there's apparently a 1000 character limit, and it was... nearly 6000. Oops. So here's the short version (sorry, by necessity, not as polite and thorough as I like).
Cost: concrete is cheap. There's no reason for it to be billions of dollars, other than the usual government waste.
However, it's WORTH billions of dollars. There are HUGE effects of having a large "off the books" population, and those effects are all BAD.
But upfront amnesty is actually worse... getting them to "come out of the shadows" sounds all great and stuff, until you realize that the shadows will fill right back up again, nearly instantly, and, for some parties (not meaning D/R "parties"), intentionally. We tried that about 30 years ago, amnesty first, and the rest... NEVER happened.
Crap, that's 1000.
Part 2:
Yes, this situation is actually somewhat intentional by some parts of our governing bodies and those who financially back them, and yes, there are people who have been here illegally for basically their whole life because of it. That is a serious problem, and ones that deserves a real solution with "finesse", and many of the people that want real border control will be willing (and in at least a good may cases, happy) to support it... AFTER the source of the problem is dealt with. No sense bailing out the water until the leak is plugged. (And see that bit about 30 years ago...)
The size of what needs to be done requires broad action. When I need to get from New York City to some place out near LA, first I take plane to LA, THEN I worry about the fine adjustments. I don't walk from NYC to LA and call it "finesse". The finesse comes after.
Grr... too short! One more.
Part 3:
Don't go by how it feels. We are in such a mess that every action has terrible effects (including doing nothing) - people's lives will be ruined, and all we can do is try to minimize how many and/or somewhat which people get it (preferably those least undeserving of it - note that construction).
Border control exists for many, many reasons, most of them very good, and most of the reasons given for how bad it would be to enforce our borders now come from... not enforcing them before. That's not a good argument for not enforcing them now - in fact, it's a great argument for getting it cleaned up as fast as possible!
Get it cleaned up, prove you CAN keep people out when necessary, and then, when you want to let in large numbers, you can credibly claim the ability to control the flow and keep out criminals and such. Build big doors if you like, but make sure you can actually close them if you want to (even 24 hour convenience stores that never close have doors and locks!).
Cool bit of backstory for Alice, and it sheds some light on why she is so stubbornly anti-authority and emotionally damaged. Based on a (probably hazy) recollection of the start of this leg of the storyline (back on the ship before she and Jay left to assault the facility), she's apparently become more aware of her psychological and emotional difficulties since the snippet above, which is the first step toward actually being able to address them. I hope Jay doesn't run off with KATE and leave Alice behind, because she can certainly use his steadiness!
author comments